Developing the IFSP:
Essential Content
Page 12 of 13
Effective strategies identify how functional outcomes will be achieved
Strategies indicate how specific child and family outcomes desired by families
can be achieved. It is particularly important to keep informed about evidence-based
practices in early intervention when selecting both initial and continuing
strategies for achieving family-selected outcomes.
The questions below guide family members and early intervention providers
in choosing effective strategies when an IFSP is initially developed, and
later, as ongoing progress is reviewed with a family. Each strategy recorded
on an IFSP should address one or more of the following guidelines:
- Individualization
- Context
- Mastery
- Collaboration
1. Individualization:
Do strategies build on child and family interests?
Children are active participants in their own development, based on their
drive to explore and master their environment. Interest-based learning has
positive benefits and is an important factor contributing to a child’s
learning and development (Dunst, Hamby, Trivette, Raab & Bruder, 2000;
Bruder, Trivette, Raab & McLean, 2001; Nelson, 1999).
Strategies should
build on family/child interests and activities such as:
- routines/special events (e.g., taking a bath, going to a family
celebration)
- objects/toys/pets (e.g. feeding a family pet,
- interactions (e,g, visiting grandma, playing with brother, answering
the phone)
- hobbies/fun/leisure (e.g., playing/listening to music, squirting hose
at one another)
- environment (e.g. taking a walk, playing in back yard, planting flowers)
 |
Examples
of strategies that build on family/child interests: |
 |
|
Outcome and Criteria
|
Strategies
|
Family outcome:
Sylvia will take Paolo to the park and shopping,
by herself
Sylvia will take one trip with Paola to either the library, mall or other
community activity by herself within the next 4-6 months
|
• Sylvia will review the mobility training
she received at the MD School for the Blind
• I/T provider (or linkage service) will
accompany Sylvia and Paola to community activities
such as the library
• Sylvia will identify available transportation
and ask family and other community supports to
accompany her on a trial run
|
Child outcome:
Neena will eat and drink by mouth like other
kids during family outings
Neena will drink a minimum of 4 oz of fluids from a cup and eat 3 spoonfuls
of food during family outings
|
• Family and I/T staff consult with GI
doctor about realistic timetable and plan for Neena
to drink and eat
• I/T providers will share information
about oral-motor development with parents and
suggest enjoyable hand/mouth games to play with
Neena
• Family and I/T staff work together to
introduce Neena to new foods and liquids and
track her likes and dislikes
• I/T staff will accompany family on outings
to adapt eating suggestions
• I/T staff will link family to other
families who have a child with a feeding tube
to see how they cope and get around in the community
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
2. Context:
Do strategies build on familiar places, people and routines?
Strategies build on familiar family/community situations and people a
family typically interacts with. An effective strategy is part of a child’s
and family’s existing (or intended) actions and interactions in
every day life. Strategies that are used only during provider-directed
therapy or lessons isolate a child and do not take advantage of the numerous
opportunities for meaningful
interactions with caregivers in environments that are most likely
to promote mastery (Dunst, Trivette, Humphries, Raab & Roper, 2001).
Examples of strategies that focus on a familiar context:
While reading to Sabrina, her family will emphasize beginning and
ending sounds of words (versus producing specific sounds “on command” from
an early intervention provider)
I/T staff will show Tallie and her parents how to walk on different surfaces
in and out of her home using her walker (versus practicing walking in a
therapy session once per week)
3. Mastery:
Do strategies ensure generalization of a child’s actions/interactions
in multiple settings and tasks?
Much evidence has accumulated about how
very young children learn. Children are active participants in their
own development, due to on their drive to explore and master their environment.
Even infants are aware of the effects of their own behaviors, and prefer
consequences that they can control directly versus those that are uncontrollable.
Expanding motor and communication behaviors depends on repetition and
practice in meaningful situations with generalization across different
settings.
Examples of strategies that encourage mastery of actions/interactions in
different places and spaces:
Mom will show grandparents how to relax Hang before her bottle (for a premature
infant who is cared for by her grandmother while her mother works)
I/T staff and Dad will look at backpacks with enough support for Dad to
take Jamie (for a toddler who enjoys the outdoors and is just learning to
sit up)
I/T staff will help parents adapt their bedtime routine so Luci can sleep
in places other than her crib (so family can go visiting with Luci who is
easily overstimulated in new situations)
LITP will help Veronique (childcare provider) find toys/activities that
encourage Kata to play quietly beside other children (for a child who is
both social and very distractable)
4. Collaboration:
Do strategies specify “who will do what”?
Shared implementation of strategies by family members, child care and
early intervention providers reinforces the evidence-based
practice of supporting key adults to promote child learning and development
in family and community settings. Discussing “who will do what”
provides another opportunity to talk with families about the early intervention
model of supports and services in natural environments.
Examples of strategies that specify “who will do what”:
I/T staff will model rate of speech for family members when talking to
Kyle
Mother will call Dr. – to ask about lactose intolerant formula
I/T staff and mother will explore community networks for child care
close to mother’s job
Family and child care provider will hold Neena so she can see what is going
on and who is talking
Table 2.3 provides examples of strategies
that build on family/child interests and routines in familiar contexts across
multiple settings to
promote child mastery and parent competence.

Website designed and hosted by:
The Center for Technology in Education (CTE)
Johns Hopkins University Copyright 2003
info@cte.jhu.edu
|
|