|
About

Overview

Background

Features

|
Overview
Many
institutions and organizations rely on standards-based assessment
for their students. In most cases, this means that students compile
a three-ring-binder portfolio showcasing their progress over the
course of a graduate studies program. The greatest criticism of
the traditional portfolio, however, is that students complete the
assignment in a vacuum and spend too much time concerned with how
it looks rather than what is says about their progress towards professional
excellence.
The
EP system was developed to mirror the Johns Hopkins M.A.T. paper
portfolio process that has been refined over the past seven years.
The electronic version was launched in 2001, pilot tested by 25
M.A.T. students over the course of a semester, and rolled out to
more than 800 preservice and in-service teachers during 2002. The
application is being improved continuously and enhanced based on
the feedback of students and faculty.
The
EP system incorporates three distinct interfaces:
-
Working portfolio: This interface, which is accessible
to only the portfolio owner, is the starting point. It is where
the owner gathers and develops evidence of his/her professional
growth over time. The owner may grant partial access to trusted
peers and advisors at any time.
-
Reviewer interface: In the Johns Hopkins M.A.T. program,
students are required to submit and defend their portfolios as
a program exit requirement. The reviewer interface allows the
review team full access to the completed portfolio, provides tools
for reviewer note-taking, and offers the ability to record preliminary
scores based on a 4-point rubric.
-
Presentation interface: This is a publicly accessible version
of the finished portfolio that includes the content the owner
wishes to share with the outside world. The presentation function
allows the owner to export any portion of his/her portfolio to
a unique URL, which can then be distributed by resume or business
card. The tool also allows the owner to customize three presentations
for different audiences.
The
JHU CTE fully supports the EP and offers a variety of wraparound
services designed to ensure successful implementation. Services
include consulting (on both product and process), surveying, training,
technical support, and other assistance as needed. Prior to implementation,
CTE conducts interviews, surveys, and mission-setting discussions
with program coordinators and a cross-section of potential users
to establish a clear plan for EP implementation and sustainability.
CTE then employs a train-the-trainers model using both face-to-face
instruction and online tutorials to train stakeholders in effective
use of the EP tools and functions.
|
|