Constructivism
and the 5 E Model Science Lesson
Introduction | Task | Resources | Process | Evaluation | Conclusion
| Introduction |
![]() |
It seems that every 3 to 5 years a new idea surfaces in the educational community. The topic has been researched, discussed, and argued in institutions of higher learning; however, when it eventually filters down to the teachers in elementary and high school, there is little time invested in explaining and understanding the new theory - they are told, "Just do it!" The latest educational buzzword is constructivism. Teachers are being asked to support this philosophy of teaching and learning, and design instruction accordingly. What does this mean?
This WebQuest will help you go beyond the basic definition of constructivism: individuals building their own understanding, to a more thorough explanation of the theory and its various aspects. Examples are provided via the 5 E learning cycle. The 5 E model for designing science lessons is just one method of instruction that supports constructivist teaching/learning. After investigating these resources, you can make your own decision as to the value of the constructivist theory.
| The Task |
![]() |
After reading and analyzing a variety of resource materials, you will share an oral presentation with your colleagues to provide a brief historical perspective of this theory and the essential elements of constructivism. As a teacher, you know that the implementation of a new philosophy requires an open mind: identify what you perceive to be some of the advantages and disadvantages of adopting the constructivist approach and present this in a visual format. Finally, use the 5 E model to assist you in designing your own constructivist science lesson.
| Resources |
![]() |
Teaching for Understanding: Educating Students for Performance - Identifies the characteristics of teaching, and classroom changes necessary to implement the constructivist approach. It questions the possibilities of truly seeing a change in practice in the near future.
Learning Cycle Instructional Model - A nice collection of essays related to constructivist education.
Constructivism and the Five E's - Mention of individual researchers associated with constructivism and specifics on each stage.
The ph factor - This site defines the responsibilities of the teacher and students at each stage of the learning cycle.
5E Model Lessons - This site has some model 5E lessons written in various formats.
Print
Brooks, J.G. & Brooks,
M. (1993). The Case for Constructivist Classrooms. VA: ASCD. This
book provides a background for constructivist education and uses real life
classroom examples.
Educational Leadership, February 1994 Issue. This journal focuses on one topic each month; this month includes many articles related to constructivism. It raises questions and provides practical suggestions.
Gardner, H. (1991). The Unschooled Mind: How Children Think and How Schools Should Teach. NY: Basic Books. This book shares research on the optimum methods of teaching so students can learn.
| The Process |
![]() |
At the completion of this process you will have 3 products: 1) an oral presentation to share with your colleagues, 2) a visual display identifying what you perceive to be the advantages and disadvantages of implementing the constructivist approach, and 3) a science lesson designed using the 5E model.
1. Oral Presentation
| Evaluation |
![]() |
| Conclusion |
![]() |
Constructivism is more than individuals building their own understanding. It requires more than active, hands-on learning. It demands teachers and students to take various roles and truly invest in their learning. It requires reflection, interaction, investigation, more reflection and analysis. This approach to learning takes time and recognizes that not everyone is going to be on the same page or even take away the same understanding from a single lesson. This theory acknowledges the complexity of the teaching / learning cycle. You have investigated only one model (5E learning cycle) that supports the constructivist approach:Do you think this model can be applied to other disciplines?
Can you identify other models or strategies that would support this type of learning?
How does this model address various learning styles?
Rubric for Constructivism and the 5E Model Science Lesson
|
|
|
|
|
| Lecture | Did not mention historical perspective; provided minimum explanation of constructivism. | Provided minimum info on historical background. Discussed the big ideas related to constructivism. | Provided sufficient info on historical background. Discussed the big ideas and included specific aspects related to constructivism. |
| Visual presentation | |||
|
|
Visual is lacking appeal due to typographical errors, inappropriate use of color, or graphics; distracting to viewer. | Visual uses a few colors, fonts, and graphics. | Visual is appealing with appropriate use of color, fonts, and graphics. It complements the presentation and helps it to flow. |
|
|
Presentation is disorganized, cluttered, and difficult for the user to follow. | Presentation has basic organizational scheme, but may be misleading for some users. | Presentation is well organized and easy to follow. Good use of graphics/color to enhance flow of info. |
|
|
Identifies broad, general issues not specific to constructivism. | Identifies a few basic issues related to constructivism. | Analysis of info evident by the identification of valid issues and specific aspects related to the constructivist approach. |
| 5E Science Lesson | |||
|
|
Did not identify" big idea" and indicators appropriate for lesson. | Missing either "big idea" or indicators for lesson OR they do not match the lesson content. | Identifies "big idea" and indicators appropriate for lesson. |
|
|
Missing two or more of the following components: captures students' attention, accesses prior knowledge, and identifies appropriate activities. | Missing one of the following components: captures students' attention, accesses prior knowledge, and identifies appropriate activities. | Addresses all components of this stage: captures students' attention, accesses prior knowledge, and identifies appropriate activities. |
|
|
Missing 3 or more components of this stage: student centered, teacher as guide, interactive, inquiry based, direct concrete experiences with the concept. | Missing 2 components of this stage: student centered, teacher as guide, interactive, inquiry based, direct concrete experiences with the concept. | Addresses all components of this stage: student centered, teacher as guide, interactive, inquiry based, direct concrete experiences with the concept. |
|
|
Missing 3 or more components of this stage: teacher and students work together, analysis of info from exploration, teacher clarifies info and shares scientific terminology, concept is formed. | Missing 2 components of this stage: teacher and students work together, analysis of info from exploration, teacher clarifies info and shares scientific terminology, concept is formed. | Addresses all components of this stage: teacher and students work together, analysis of info from exploration, teacher clarifies info and shares scientific terminology, concept is formed. |
| Extension/Expansion/
Elaboration |
Missing 2 component of this stage: student centered, active learning, activities to deepen understanding of concept OR apply to a real world situation. | Missing one component of this stage: student centered, active learning, activities to deepen understanding of concept OR apply to a real world situation. | Addresses all components of this stage: student centered, active learning, activities to deepen understanding of concept OR apply to a real world situation. |
|
|
Lacking means to evaluate or inappropriate tool identified. | Evaluation conducted only at end of lesson. | Appropriate formal and informal evaluations are identified throughout lesson. |
Based
on a template from The
WebQuest Page.
Any
comments, please contact Kathy
Ullrich
Last updated June 30, 2004