Multimedia Project Design
|
Project Title: The Road to the White House
|
Grade Level: 7 & 8 |
|
Subject/Topic Area(s) Social Studies (American History)
|
|
|
Designed By: Arlett Hartie
|
Date: August 6, 2000 |
|
School District: Prince George’s County |
School: Hyattsville Middle School |
|
Goal: The goal of this project is to help students improve their MSPAP scores in writing to persuade and in social studies political systems. These goals will be achieved while students follow the steps taken by candidates that lead to the White House, and by completing follow up activities that include further research, a debate, a quiz, and a letter to a newspaper editor
|
|
Content Standards: By the end of 8th grade students know and are able to do everything required at earlier grades and are able to:
The Bill of Rights…
Constitutional amendments;
Participate in the political process and ways in which individuals and groups can advance or impede political decisions.
|
|
Project Summary: This computer-mediated multimedia project allows students to follow the step-by-step procedures taken by candidates for president, from the moment of declaring to election day.
|
|
Objectives/Desired Results (What will the learners understand as a result of this project?)Students will incorporate organizational writing strategies while using a word processor to generate a letter articulating the three amendments to the Constitution that gave black men, women and people eighteen and older the right to vote. ________________________________________________________________________ Plans for Facilitation: . students’ knowledge of the above Maryland Standards, . students’ use of the computer to access power point . students’ use of Microsoft word to write a letter to persuade to a newspaper editor
|
|
Instructional Resources: Power point presentation, the internet (http://home.netscape.com/escapes/search/ntsrchrnd-3html) , newspapers, magazines, TV and radio news stories |
|
Type of Assessment Used (e.g. observations, work samples, electronic discussions, dialogues)Observations, quiz, letter to an editor, cooperative group participation |
|
Scoring tool (e.g. rubric) to be used for evaluation. Be as specific as possible. 4 -Well written letter, with clearly stated opinions and supporting details
3 –Well-written letter with opinion and supporting details fairly stated. 2 – Letter fairly written with opinions or supporting details not clearly stated 1 – Letter poorly written, opinion and supporting details not obvious and/or views not clearly expressed.
|