Literary Theories:  A Sampling of Critical Lenses
Literary theories were developed as a means to understand the various ways people read texts.  The proponents of each theory believe their theory is the theory, but most of us interpret texts according to the "rules" of several different theories at a time.  All literary theories are lenses through which we can see texts.  There is nothing to say that one theory is better than another or that you should read according to any of them, but it is sometimes fun to "decide" to read a text with one in mind because you often end up with a whole new perspective on your reading.
What follows is a summary of some of the most common schools of literary theory.  These    descriptions are extremely cursory, but it is enough to get the general idea.  I've left extra room for your own note-taking from the in-class lecture.  Enjoy!

Feminist Criticism:
A feminist critic sees cultural and economic disabilities in a "patriarchal" society that have    hindered or prevented women from realizing their creative possibilities and women's cultural identification as a merely negative object, or "Other," to the man as the defining and         dominating "Subject."  There are several assumptions that are held in common by most feminist critics:
1.  Our civilization is pervasively patriarchal.
2.  The concepts of "gender" are largely, if not entirely, cultural constructs, effected  by the omnipresent patriarchal biases of our civilization.
3.  This patriarchal ideology also pervades those writing that have been considered  great literature.  Such works lack autonomous female role models, are implicitly 
addressed to male readers, and leave the woman reader an outsider or else solicit her  to identify against herself by assuming male values and ways of perceiving, feeling, and  acting.
UNDER THIS THEORY FOCUS UPON:  relationships between the genders, patterns of thought/behavior.
 
 
 
 
 

Reader Response:
This type of criticism does not designate any one critical theory but focuses on the activity of reading a work of literature.  Reader response critics turn from the traditional concept of a work as an achieved structure of meanings to the responses of readers as their eyes follow a text.  By this shift of perspective, a literary work is shifted to an activity that goes on in a reader's mind, and what had been features of the work (character, style, plot, etc.) are less 
important than the reader's connections between experience and the text.
UNDER THIS THEORY FOCUS UPON:  relationships between the reader's experience and the text at hand.  **Literature has no objective meaning.

Click here to go to Page 2
Page last updated 19 February 2001